Problems of the Network Approach in Sociology

Abstract: 
The network approach in sociology is considered as the idea of the network arrangement of sociological knowledge. Numerous versions of the network approach can be found in the literature, typical of which can be considered: social network analysis, relational sociology and actor-network theory. At the same time, there are attempts to explain the specifics of the network approach in terms of general systems theory. The article explores the problem-oriented basis for the network approach in sociology. As a key problem, the author analyzes the inconsistency of the scientific principles of creation and functioning of, on the one hand, a narrative, i.e. a generally accepted sociological tool, and on the other hand, the idea of a network, i.e. a purely informational concept, articulated in various sociological studies with varying degrees of formality. The article interprets the network approach in sociology as a problematic of the conceptual transition from the narrative, which, according to the sociological tradition, initially describes certain social processes, to a specific network representation of these processes. The reasons why the idea of a network, verbally included in the name of the entire approach, are thought of primarily metaphorically are analyzed. The main reason is the lack of a generally recognized concept of a network that can combine in a single analytical procedure, on the one hand, the semantic relations of the sociological narrative, on the other hand, the apparatus of discrete representation of sociological knowledge, called the network within the framework of the approach under consideration.

For citation: Kanygin G.V. Problems of the Network Approach in Sociology. St. Petersburg Sociology Today. 2023. N. 21. P. 72-88. DOI:10.25990/socinstras.pss-21.cpww-t559

edn: 
GOTZRY
References: 
  • Blog pro neyroseti. ChatGPT na russkom. 2023. URL: https://trychatgpt.ru/ (access date: 23.08.2023). (In Russ.)
  • Gradoselskaya G. V. Network measurements in sociology: textbook. Ed. G. S. Batygin. Moscow, Novyy uchebnik, 2004. (In Russ.)
  • Kalinina E. The essence of network analysis in the humanities. Izuchayem Digital Humanities (access date: 02.08.2023). (In Russ.).
  • Kanygin G. V. Problems of semantic reconstruction of the sociological narrative. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Sotsiologiya, 2022, vol. 15, iss. 3, pp. 224–237. (In Russ.)
  • Latour B. On the actor-network theory. Some clarifications, supplemented by even greater complications. LOGOS, 2017, 27, no. 1, pp. 173–200. URL: https://logosjournal.ru/upload/iblock/198/Logos_2017_1_3_1_Latour.pdf. (In Russ.)
  • Maltseva D. V. Network approach in sociology: genesis of ideas and application: monograph. D. V. Mal'tseva. Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy gumanitarnyy universitet. Novosibirsk, Novosibirskiy gosudarstvennyy tekhnicheskiy universitet, 2017. (In Russ.)
  • Maltseva D. V. Network approach as a phenomenon of sociological theory. Sotsiologicheskie issledovanija, 2018, no. 4, pp. 3–14. (In Russ.)
  • Markina I. V. Relational Sociology by Pierpaolo Donati. Nauchnyy rezul'tat. Sotsiologiya i upravleniye, 2015, no 3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/relyatsionnaya-sotsiologiya-pierpaolo-... (access date: 06.30.2023). (In Russ.)
  • Metody setevogo analiza [IT company Help IT.me. Smart service]. 08.20.2020. URL: https://helpit.me/articles/methody-setevogo-analiza (access date: 08.02.2023). (In Russ.)
  • Setevoy analiz: metody dlya resheniya aktual'nykh zadach [Higher School of Economics]. 2017. URL: https://www.hse.ru/news/admission/207895702.html (access date: 02.08.2023). (In Russ.)
  • Chto takoye problema issledovaniya [Google query]. 2023. URL: https://rb.gy/b3wvs. (access date: 02.08.2023). (In Russ.)
  • Allais M. La science économique d’aujourd’hui et les faits. Revue des Deux Mondes, 1990, Juin, pp. 54–74.
  • Arnason J. Civilizational Patterns and Civilizing Processes. International Sociology, 2001, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 387–405.
  • Bazeley P. Regulating qualitative coding using QDAS? Sociological Methodology, 2012, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 77–78.
  • Berger R. J., Quinney R. The Narrative Turn in Social Inquiry. Storytelling Sociology: Narrative as Social Inquiry. R. J. Berger, R. Quinney (eds.). Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2004, pp. 1–13.
  • Charmaz K. Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructive Methods. K. N. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Ca., Sage, 2000, pp. 509–535.
  • Dragicevic N., Ullrich A., Tsui E., Gronau N. A Conceptual Model of Knowledge Dynamics in the Industry 4.0 Smart Grid Scenario. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 2020, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 199–213.
  • Evers J. C. Current issues in qualitative data analysis software (QDAS): A user and developer perspective. The Qualitative Report, 2018, vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 61–74. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss13/5. (access date: 02.11.2022).
  • Gavrilova T., Alsufyev A., Yanson A.-S. Modern Notation of Business Models: Visual Trend. Foresight-Russia, 2014, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 56–70. URL: http://foresight-journal.hse.ru/data/2014/07/10/1311938700/5-Gavrilova.pdf (access date: 02.11.2021). (In Russ.)
  • Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 1973, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1360–1380.
  • Kanygin G., Kononova O. Conceptual Approach to Express Tacit Knowledge by Human–Machine Interactions. E. Zaramenskikh, A. Fedorova (eds.). Digital Transformation and New Challenges. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, 2021, vol. 45. Springer, Cham. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71397-3_5 (In Russ.)
  • Kanygin G., Koretckaia V. Analytical Coding: Performing Qualitative Data Analysis Based on Programming Principles. The Qualitative Report, 2021, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 316–333.
  • Noy N. F., McGuinness D. L. Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. 2000. URL: http://protege.stanford.edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology10.... (access date: 02.11.2021).
  • Donati P. Building a Relational Theory of Society: A Sociological Journey. M. Deflem (ed.). Sociologists in a Global Age. Biographical Perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007, pp. 159–174.
  • Pierre E. St., Jackson A. Y. Qualitative Data Analysis after Coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 2014, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 715–719.
  • Thompson R. Reporting the Results of Computer-assisted Analysis of Qualitative Research Data [42 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. Forum: Qualitative Social Research [On-line Journal], 2002, May, 3(2). Retrieved 20.10.2020 from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/864/1878 (access date: 02.11.2021).
  • UML: Unified Modeling Language 2.5. 2015. URL: https://clck.ru/SMAJH (access date: 01.11.2021).