The experience of studying the socio-ecological situation in small mono-industrial cities of Russia

Abstract: 
The article describes the author's approach to the study of environmental problems using the concept of socio-ecological situation. The interpretation of this concept and an example of its use in the survey of small mono-industrial cities of Russia are given. The results of such a survey are given. These results show that this approach can be used in the study of environmental problems of small towns and other socio-territorial entities.
edn: 
TOHPIO

For citation: Mischenko A.S. The experience of studying the socio-ecological situation in small mono-industrial cities of Russia. St. Petersburg Sociology Today. 2022. N. 18. P. 69-85. DOI:10.25990/socinstras.pss-18.8m3e-kx37

References: 
  • Cable S., Benson M. Acting locally: Environmental injustice and the emergence of grass-roots environmental organizations, Social Problems, 1993, 40, (4), pp. 464–477.
  • Kochurov B.I. Geoekologiya: ekodiagnostika i ekologo-hozyajstvennyj balans territorii [Kochurov B.I. Geoecology: ecodiagnostics and ecological and economic balance of the territory.]. Smolensk.: SGU [Smolensk.: SSU], 1999, 154 p.
  • Los' V.A. Ekologicheskie itogi razvitiya civilizacii na rubezhe ХХ-ХХ1vv. (predvaritel'nyj analiz) [Los V.A. Ecological results of the development of civilization at the turn of the XX-XX1 centuries. (preliminary analysis)]. Filosofskaya mysl' [Philosophical thought.], 2013, 10, pp.121-141. (In Russian).
  • Markovich D.ZH., ZHukov V.I., Bganba-Cerera V.R. Social'no-ekologicheskaya situaciya v Rossii. Social'naya ekologiya: Uchebnoe posobie [Markovich D.Zh., Zhukov V.I., Bganba-Tserera V.R. Socio-ecological situation in Russia. // Social ecology: Textbook.]. M.: Izd-vo MGSU «Soyuz» [ Moscow.: Publishing house of MGSU "Soyuz".], 1998, 340 p. (In Russian).
  • Moiseev N.N. Prirodnyj faktor i krizisy civilizacii [Moiseev N.N. Natural factor and crises of civilization]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'[Social sciences and modernity.], 1992, 5. pp. 84-95.  (In Russian).
  • Saitta P. History, space, and power: Theoretical and methodological problems in the research on areas at (industrial) risk, Journal of Risk Research, 2012, 15, (1), pp. 1299–1317.
  • Schlosberg D. Preconceiving Environmental Justice: Global Movements and Political Theories, Environmental Politics, 2004, 13, (3), pp. 517–540.
  • Sosunova I.A. Social'no-ekologicheskaya napryazhyonnost': metodologiya i metodika ocenki [Sosunova I.A. Socio-ecological tension: methodology and assessment methodology.].  Sociologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological research], 2005,7. pp. 94-104. (In Russian).
  • Sosunova I.A. Aktual'nye problemy social'noj ekologii i ekosociologii (kurs lekcij) [Sosunova I.A. Actual problems of social ecology and ecosociology (course of lectures). Moscow: NIA-Priroda. 2009. 173 p.]. M: NIA-Priroda, 2009. 173 s. (In Russian).
  • Tagaeva T.O., Gilmundinov V.M., Kazantseva L.K. Ekologicheskaya situatsiya i prirodoohrannaya politika v regionah Rossii [Environmental situation and environmental policy in the regions of Russia], Ekonomika regiona [Regional economy], 2016, 12 (1), pp. 78-92. (In Russian).
  • Taylor D.E. The rise of the Environmental Justice paradigm: Injustice framing and the social construction of environmental discourses, American Behavior Science, 2000, 43, (4), pp. 508–580.