Intergenerational Family Relationship Trends

Abstract: 
Transformations of the modern Russian family, the specificity of which consists in the preservation of traditionalism and continuity, and at the same time — the openness to new things, occur against the background of social changes associated with generational shifts. A generation enters life with different values and attitudes. While maintaining the high significance of the family and intergenerational relationships, behavioral patterns change. In recent years, both absolutely “new” phenomena and forms of maintaining family communication have emerged, as well as relatively “new” ones that did not have wide distribution earlier. The materials of an empirical study of Petersburg students’ ideas about the family and their interactions with parents prove the simultaneous existence of “old” and “new” phenomena and tendencies of intergenerational relations. The conclusion is made about the preservation of intergenerational continuity. However, the ambiguity of the assessments of young people suggests a more pragmatic approach. External circumstances and specific situations are beginning to play a big role.

For citation: Burmykina O.N. Intergenerational Family Relationship Trends. St. Petersburg Sociology Today. 2019. N. 12. P. 134-153. DOI:10.25990/socinstras.pss-12.37dm-dk27

References: 
  • Bozhko M. «Babushka rodila sebe vnukov». Sobesednik. RU 7 sentyabrya 2010 URL: http://sobesednik.ru/incident/sobes-34-10-babushka?quicktabs-1=0 (in Russian).
  • «Babushka rodila sebe... vnukov» https://www.obozrevatel.com/news/2010/9/6/388884. htm (in Russian).
  • «Babushki, rodivshiye sobstvennykh vnukov» 17 maya 2013 g. URL: https://deti.mail. ru/news/babushki-rodivshie-sobstvennyh-vnukov/ (in Russian).
  • Burmykina O. N. Cemeynyye i mezhpokolencheskiye vzaimodeystviya peterburgskikh studentov nachala XXI veka // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii 2008. Tom XI № 3 (44), S.48-64. (in Russian).
  • Burmykina O. N. Mezhpokolennyye vzaimodeystviya v sem’ye: podderzhka i sotsial’nyye seti. // Sem’ya v Rossii i Kitaye. Protsess modernizatsii. / Pod red. I. Yeliseyevoy i An’tsi Syuy. SPB: Nestor — Istoriya. 2015. S.199-232. (in Russian).
  • Burmykina O. N. Dinamika predstavleniy peterburgskikh studentov o sem’ye i mezhpokolennykh otnosheniyakh (2007-2017 gg.) // Peterburgskaya sotsiologiya segodnya. 2018.№ 9.S.27-46. (in Russian).
  • Vishnevskiy A. G., Zakharov S. V., Ivanova Ye.I. Evolyutsiya rossiyskoy sem’i // Ekologiya i zhizn’. 2008. № 9. S.4-9. (in Russian).
  • Vdovina M. V. Mezhpokolennyy konflikt v sovremennoy rossiyskoy sem’ye // Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya. 2005. № 1. S.102-104. (in Russian).
  • Vdovina M. V. Funktsional’nyye izmeneniya mezhpokolencheskogo konflikta v rossiyskoy sem’ye. — avtoref. dokt.dis. M. 2008. (in Russian).
  • Gorshkov M. K. Young People and Future Economy. Upravlenets. — The Manager. 2018. vol. T.9. no 3. S. 2-7. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2018-9-3-1 (in Russian).
  • Gurko Ye. M. Predstavleniya studencheskoy molodezhi o brake // Aktual’nyye problemy semey v Rossii / Red.T. A. Gurko. M.: Institut sotsiologii RAN, 2006. S. 202-212. (in Russian).
  • Gurko T. A. Transformatsiya instituta sovremennoy sem’i // Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya. 1995. № 10. S. 95-99. (in Russian).
  • Gurko T. A., Khromacheva A.YU. Studenty-sotsiologi o sem’ye, gendere i otnoshenii k roditelyam // Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii. 2015. № 15. S. 57-71. (in Russian).
  • Gurko T. A. Novyye semeynyye formy: tendentsii rasprostraneniya i ponyatiya // Sotsiologicheskiye issledovaniya 2017.№ 11, S.99-110. (in Russian).
  • Golod S. I. Sovremennaya sem’ya: plyuralizm modeley // Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal. 1996. № 3/4. S. 99-108; Golod S. I. Sem’ya i brak: istoriko-sotsiologicheskiy analiz. SPb: Petropolis, 1998. 272s. (in Russian).
  • Golod S. I. Perspektivy monogamnoy sem’i: sravnitel’nyy mezhkul’turnyy analiz // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii. 2003. T. VI. № 2. S. 106-119 (in Russian).
  • Dafflon D. Molodezh’ Rossii: portret pokoleniya na perelome // Vestnik Obshchestvennogo mneniya. 2008. № 5 (97). S.19-35. (in Russian).
  • Yeliseyeva I. I., Kletsin A. A. Gorodskaya sem’ya v Rossii: sovremennyye tendentsii // Peterburgskaya sotsiologiya segodnya. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov Sotsiologicheskogo instituta RAN. SPb: Nestor-Istoriya, 2010.S. 127-136. (in Russian).
  • Zhiznennyye miry sovremennoy rossiyskoy sem’i: monografiya / Z.KH.Saraliyeva, V. A. Blonin, N.YU.Yegorova i dr. / N. Novgorod, izd-vo NNGU 2015. — 264 s. (in Russian).
  • Zakharov S. V. Noveyshiye tendentsii formirovaniya sem’i v Rossii // Mir Rossii 2007. № 4, S.73-112. (in Russian).
  • Zubok YU.A., Chuprov V. I. Otnosheniye molodezhi k sem’ye v izmenyayushcheysya sotsial’noy real’nosti. // Sem’ya v sovremennom obshchestve. Seriya «Demografiya. Sotsiologiya. Ekonomika». Tom 4, № 1 / Pod redaktsiyey chl. — korr. RAN Ryazantseva S. V., d. sots. n. Rostovskoy T. K. — M.: Izd-vo «Ekon-inform», 2018. S.103-108. (in Russian).
  • Itogi perepisi naseleniya 2010. Tom 6 http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/perepis2010/croc/Documents/Vol6/pub-... (in Russian).
  • Kon I. S. Tri v odnom: seksual’naya, gendernaya i semeynaya revolyutsii // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii. 2011. T. 14. No 1. S. 51-65. (in Russian).
  • Kozyreva P. M., Lezhnina YU. P. Rossiyskaya molodezh’: sem’ya, brak, seksual’nost’ // Rossiya i Kitay: molodezh’ XXI veka: Monografiya / Otv. red. M. K. Gorshkov, Li Chunlin’, Z. T. Golenkova, P. M. Kozyreva. M.: Novyy khronograf, 2014. S. 192-220. (in Russian).
  • Klimantova G. I. Sem’ya v usloviyakh mirovykh sotsial’nykh transformatsiy // Sem’ya i semeynoye vospitaniye:    kross-kul’turnyy    analiz na materiale
  • Rossii i SSHA // OOO “Kvant Media”. 2015 http://www.rulit.me/books/