St. Petersburg Residents’ Visions of a Perfect Urban Environment (using Ligovka-Yamskaya Municipal District as an Example)

Abstract: 
The study investigates residents’ perceptions of the urban environment in the Ligovka-Yamskaya Municipal District through in-depth interviews and mental mapping. It examines views on infrastructure, public spaces, safety, and visions of an ideal urban landscape. The findings highlight the benefits of the district’s central location, transport network, and cultural landmarks, as well as issues with the lack of green spaces and aging infrastructure. Recommendations include expanding parks, updating infrastructure, and promoting non-motorized transport. It also suggests enhancing cultural and community engagement through the revitalization of historical sites and volunteer initiatives. The study emphasizes the importance of sustainable development, improving living conditions, and strengthening community ties.

Keywords:

doi: 

10.25990/socinstras.pss-25.se3f-zb54

For citation: Skobelina S.S. St. Petersburg Residents’ Visions of a Perfect Urban Environment (using Ligovka-Yamskaya Municipal District as an Example). St. Petersburg Sociology Today. 2024. N. 25. P. 32-69. DOI:10.25990/socinstras.pss-25.se3f-zb54

edn: 
DRYKVE
File: 
PDF icon 2024-25-02.pdf
References: 
  • Anokhin A. A., Lachininskii S. S., Zhitin D. V, Shendrik A. V, Mezhevich N. M., Krasnov A. I. Post-Soviet Urban Environment: The Experience of St. Petersburg. Regional Research of Russia, 2017, no. 7 (3), pp. 249-258. DOI: 10.1134/ S2079970517030042.
  • Axenov K. Between degradation and gentrification in a post-transformational metropolis city center: the case of St. Petersburg. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2014, no. 55 (6), pp. 656-673.
  • Axenov K., Petri O. Socio-spatial differentiation and public accessibility of urban spaces in the post-transformational city — case study Saint-Petersburg. Europa Regional, 2014, no. 4, pp. 42-48.
  • Batool A., Rutherford P, McGraw P., Ledgeway T., Altomonte S. View Preference in Urban Environments. Lighting Research & Technology, 2020, no. 53 (7), pp. 613-636. DOI: 10.1177/1477153520981572.
  • Bater J. H. Central St. Petersburg: Continuity and Change in Privilege and Place. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2006, no. 47, pp. 27-41.
  • Bernt M. How Post-Socialist is Gentrification? Observations in East Berlin and Saint Petersburg. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2016, no. 57 (4-5), pp. 565-587. DOI: 10.1080/15387216.2016.1259079.
  • Bieling C., Plieninger T., Pirker H., Vogl C. R. Linkages Between Landscapes and Human Well-Being: An Empirical Exploration with Short Interviews. Ecological Economics, 2014, no. 105, pp. 9-30.
  • Carmona M., Heath T., Oc T., Tiesdell S., Carmona M. Public Places — Urban Spaces. 1st ed. London, Routledge, 2003. DOI: 10.4324/9780080515427.
  • Castells M. The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban-Regional Process. Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1989.
  • Cresswell T. Place: A Short Introduction. Jersey, Wiley-Blackwell, 2004.
  • Denieffe S. Commentary: Purposive Sampling: Complex or Simple? Research Case Examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 2020, no. 25 (8), pp. 662-663. DOI: 10.1177/1744987120928156.
  • Glazkov K. Mental’nye karty: ogranicheniya metoda i obraz “chuzhogo” v malom gorode. Laboratorium: Zhurnal sotsial’nykh issledovaniy, 2015, no. 3, pp. 106-117. (In Russ.)
  • Jacobs J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York, Random House, 1961.
  • Kitchin R. Cognitive Maps: What are They and Why Study Them? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1994, no. 14, pp. 1-19. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80194-X.
  • Leyden K. M., Goldberg A., Duval R. D. The Built Environment, Maintenance of the Public Sphere and Connections to Others and to Place: An Examination of
  • 10 International Cities. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 2011, no. 4 (1), pp. 25-38. DOI: 10.1080/17549175. 2011.559946.
  • Linov V. Redeveloping the Historical Centre of Saint Petersburg, Russia: A New Approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Civil Engineering, 2015, no. 168 (5), pp. 17-30. DOI: 10.1680/cien.14.00029.
  • Lowenthal D. The Past is a Foreign Country. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1985.
  • Lund H. Pedestrian Environments and Sense of Community. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2002, no. 21 (3), pp. 301-312. DOI: 10.1177/0739456 X0202100307.
  • Lynch K. The Image of the City. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1960.
  • McAndrews C., Florez J., Deakin E. Views of the Street: Using Community Surveys and Focus Groups to Inform Context-Sensitive Design. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006, no. 1981, pp. 92-99. DOI: 10.3141/1981-15.
  • Mirza L., Byrd H. Measuring View Preferences in Cities: A Window Onto Urban Landscapes. Cities & Health, 2020, no. 7 (2), pp. 250-259. DOI: 10.1080/23748 834.2020.1765449.
  • Nenko A., Kurilova M. Emotional Geography of St. Petersburg: Detecting Emotional Perception of the City Space. Digital Transformation and Global Society: Third International Conference, DTGS 2018, St. Petersburg, Russia, May 30 — June 2, 2018, Revised Selected Papers, Part II, 3, pp. 95-110. Springer International Publishing.
  • Whitehand J. Mental Maps of Urban Morphology. Urban Morphology, 2022, no. 6 (1). DOI: 10.51347/jum.v6i1.5130.
  • Wirth L. Urbanism as a Way of Life. American Journal of Sociology, 1938, no. 44 (1), pp. 1-24.
  • Zhitin D. V., Lachininskii S. S., Mikhaylova A. A., Shendrik A. V. Urban Transformation of a Post-Soviet Coastal City: The Case of Saint Petersburg. Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 2020, no. 13 (1), pp. 145-158. DOI: 10.24057/2071-9388-2019-77.
Received: 
15.07.2024
Revised after review: 
16.08.2024
Accepted for publication: 
30.09.2024
  • Русский