Theories and Practices of Family Policy in the XX and XXI Centuries

Abstract: 
In the 2010-th mass resentment towards such liberal conceptions as feminism, greeting of large-scale immigration, equal value of traditional and same-sex marriages contributes to the surge of right populism in the West and neo-traditionalism in Russia. In the domains of family and sexuality, Russian neo-traditionalism manifests itself in hostility to some patterns, interpreted as Trojan horse of the West, rather than in real behaviour. State paternalism is typical of family policy in many Western countries. While, due to specificity of civilization matrix, state paternalism is inevitable in Russia, it should be kept within reasonable boundaries. Progress in interaction between a state and non-profit NGOs remains to be topical for today’s Russia.

For citation: Klupt M.А. Theories and Practices of Family Policy in the XX and XXI Centuries. St. Petersburg Sociology Today. 2019. N. 11. P. 5-22. DOI:10.25990/socinstras.pss-11.c25h-ac49

References: 

Albrecht С., Fichtl A. Redler P. Fathers in Charge? Parental Leave Policies for Fathers in Europe. ifo DICE Report, 2017, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 49-51.

De Goll’ Sh. Voennye memuary [War memoirs]. Vol. 3: Spasenie 1944-1946 [Salvation 1944-1946]. Moscow, AST, Astrel’, Tranzitkniga, 2004, 799 p. (In Russian)

De Luca Barrusse V. La revanche des familles nombreuses : les premiers jalons d’une politique familiale (1896-1939). Revue d’histoire de la protection sociale, 2009, no. 2, pp. 47-63.

Fliseeva I. I., Klupt M. A. Transformatsiya sem’i v Rossii i Kitae: sravnitel’nyy analiz [Family transformation in Russia and China: comparative analysis]. Voprosy statistiki [Issues of Statistics], 2016, no. 8, pp. 53-65. DOI: 10.34023/2313-6383-2016-0-8-53-65. (In Russian)

Gap on Trump Approval Bigger than Predecessors’. M. Brenan. URL: https://news.gallup.com/poll/226178/gender-gap-trump-approval-bigger-predecessors.aspxGender (access date: 06.05.2019).

Klupt M. A. Gosudarstvo, «tretiy sektor» i demograficheskaya politika [State, “the third sector” and population policy]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [SociologicalStudies], 2016, no. 6, p. 24-33. (In Russian)

Klupt M. A. Transformatsiya i diskursy kitayskoy sem’i [Transformation and Discourses of Chinese Family]. Novaya znachimost’ sem’i i mezhpokolennyh otnosheniy v Rossii i Kitae [New Importance of Family and International Relations for Russia and China]. Ed by. I. I. Fliseeva. Saint Petersburg, Renome, 2018, pp. 12-49. DOI: 10.25990/ socinstras.10.25990/socinstras.rus-chin.mrzj-mb83. (In Russian)

Kobold K., Schmiedel S. Wahlverhalten bei der Bundestagswahl 2017 nach Geschlecht und Alter. Ergebnisse der reprasentativen Wahlstatistik. Statistisches Bundesamt. WISTA, 2018, no. 3, pp. 142-157.

Le Bras H. Marianne et les lapins: L’Obsession demographique. Olivier Orban, 1991, 284 p.

Lennerhed L. The Swedish Sterilisation Policy: A Skeleton in the Cupboard? Reproductive Health Matters, 1997, no. 10, pp. 156-157.

Letablier M.-T. Fertility and Family Policies in France. Journal of Population and Social Security (Population), 2003, vol. 1, Supplement, pp. 245-261.

Lobbying for Faith and Family. A Study of Religious NGOs at the United Nations. Norad Report 7/2013. Oslo, 2013, 38 p.

Lomanov A. Neokonservatizm s kitayskoy spetsifikoy [Neo-conservatism with Chinese specifics]. Rossiya v global’noy politike [Russia in Global Affairs], 2017, no. 4, URL: https://globalaffairs.ru/number/Neokonservatizm-s-kitaiskoi-spetcifikoi-18915 (access date: 06.05.2019). (In Russian)

Messu М. Les politiques familiales: du natalisme a la solidarite. Paris, Les edition ouvriere, 1992, 142 p.

Mossuz J. La regulation des naissances: les aspects politiques du debat. Revue franqaise de science politique, 1966, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 913-939.

Partisympatiundersokningen november 2018. Stockholm, SCB, 2018, URL: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/2bdd1d03007048c9a8f3338710bf91dd/me0201... (access date: 06.05.2019).

Partisympatiundersokningen november 2018. Stockholm, SCB, 2018, URL: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/2bdd1d03007048c9a8f3338710bf91dd/me0201... (access date: 06.05.2019).

Rosental P.-A. L ’intelligence demographique. Sciences et politiques des populations en France (1930-1960). Paris, Odile Jacob, 2003, 368 p.

Rossiyanov O. K. TSena progressa i tsennosti nauki: novaya kniga po istorii evgeniki [The price of progress and values of science. New book on history of eugenics]. Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniya i tehniki [Issues of history of natural science and technws], 2000, no. 1, pp. 178-86. (In Russian)

Thebaud F. Le mouvement nataliste dans la France de l’entre-deux-guerres: l’Alliance nationale pour l’accroissement de la population franjaise. Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine, 1985, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 273-301.

Vzglyady rossiyan na feminizm [Russians’ views on feminism]. URL: https://iom.anketolog.ru/2018/10/15/otnoshenie-rossiyan-k-feminizmu (access date: 05.05.2019). (In Russian)

World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision. UN, 2017. File F/4. URL: https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/Fertility/ (access date: 06.05.2019).

Zelikova Yu. A., Chernova Zh. V. Paternalizm sovremennoy rossiyskoy semeynoy politiki: pozitsiya gosudarstva i ozhidaniya grazhdan [Paternalism of contemporary Russian family policy: the state position and the cityzens’ expectations]. CHelovek. Soobshchestvo. Upravlenie [Human. Community. Management], 2012, no. 4, pp. 96-110. (In Russian)